Wednesday, October 1, 2008

The Straw that broke the Misanthrope's Back

"According to The Book of Revelations:

The Anti-Christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language..."

How is this allowed, MASSLIVE.COM? This passage is not only FALSE, it's insulting to those who have ever read the Book of Revelation (which makes no mention of this passage) and those Muslims who practice Islam. Why can people post anything they want, especially racist, bigoted and sexist comments? The person who posted this is a joke and the MASSLIVE.COM staff who let it be posted are jokes.

FACTS:

1. Islam was created in the 7th century (600 A.D). The prophet Muhammad (PBUH) recieved the Qur'an from the archangel Gabriel. He is, supposedly, the restorer of the faith of Abraham, Moses and Jesus (PBUT).

2. The Bible, as you know it today, was compiled in or around the 2nd century (100 A.D). So how can a Muslim be in a book created 500 years before Islam was created? More specifically, the King James Version of the Bible, was created in 1611. This is the version of the Bible that America knows and it is nothing more than a translation of Latin, Greek and Hebrew text.

3. The Book of Revelation (K.J.V) mentions no specific "Anti-Christ"; actually the word or two words, "Anti-Christ" do not appear in the Bible at all. As mentioned above, there is no mention of a Muslim man either. But here is a direct quote from the Book of Revelation:

Revelation 13:1 (K.J.V)

"And I (the apostle John) stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having SEVEN HEADS and TEN HORNS, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of BLASPHEMY."

In the second verse of the 13th chapter it goes on to say this "beast" John "saw" was a mix of leopard, bear and lion. Also, the dragon (a.k.a the Devil or Satan) "gives" this "beast" his "power".

Read everything for yourself.

1 comment:

pvep-kristen said...

Every time we -- producers of masslive -- try to commmunicate with you, you have no response. Why are you not interested in dialogue?